Dr. Robert A. Herrmann

Originally Compiled by the staff of the Institute for Mathematics and Philosophy


Professional Experience

General Research Accomplishments

Some Awards and Biographical Listings


1. Education:

Ph. D., Mathematics, 1973, American University.
M. A., 1968, Mathematics, American University.
B. A., 1963, Mathematics, Johns Hopkins University.

In June 1953, Dr. Herrmann graduated, with honors and first in his class, from the Baltimore Polytechnic Institute (Advanced College Preparatory Course). His "Poly" grade point average is equivalent to 4.0. (This is the "Poly" course content.) He received a scholarship to Johns Hopkins University (JHU). For significant personal reasons, he was accorded a leave-of-absence from JHU in January 1955. He returned to full and part-time study beginning in September 1960 and graduated from Hopkins with honors. He was elected to Phi Beta Kappa. Dr. Herrmann continued in the M.Ed. program at the Johns Hopkins McCoy College and subsequently continued his education towards the M.A. in Mathematics.

Dr. Herrmann received a special individual three-year fellowship from the National Science Foundation to be used for graduate study at any university of his choice. He was elected to Phi Kappa Phi as partial recognition for his graduate school achievements, which include a 4.0 grade point average. He has 141 credit hours in mathematics and 37 credit hours in the physical sciences. Of these 178 course hours, his GPA for 157 graded hours is 4.0. This is Dr. Herrmann's transcript for his (AU) graduate school education in mathematics. He was elected to Sigma Xi for his research activities. Dr. Herrmann is also a certified physics instructor.

After graduating from Johns Hopkins, many graduate schools offered Dr. Herrmann fellowships and assistantships. Due to family responsibilities, he rejected all of them and continued as a public high school instructor in advanced placement mathematics while continuing his graduate studies on a part-time basis. Various monetary grants were used for his graduate studies.

While in graduate school at the American University, besides the course material, Dr. Herrmann passed seven written four-hour comprehensive examinations, and an additional oral defense, and wrote two original research dissertations. For the M.A. degree, his 65-page dissertation is titled "Some Characteristics of Topologies on Subfamilies of a Power Set" (University Microfilms, M-1469); for the Ph.D., his 150-page dissertation is titled, "Non-Standard Characteristics for Topological Structures" (University Microfilms 73-28,762). [In 73-28,762, portions of Theorem 8.38 are not established correctly. A correct proof appears in the Bulletin of the Australian Math. Soc. 13(1975) No. 2, p. 277.]

Dr. Herrmann has a rare controllable eidetic memory. He controls the vividness of recalled visual images. This controlled recall varies from image details that are ordinarily described to details as exact as a colored photograph. He can also control the time period over which the images can easily be recalled. Of additional historical interest is that Dr. Herrmann served in the Armed Forces of the United States and was honorably discharged.

Note: Dr. Herrmann's brother, Ernest C. Herrmann, Jr., Ph.D. (Microbiology), discovered the first commercially viable antiviral drug. He was a pioneer in this research activity. Further, he established and was the director of the Mayo Clinic Clinical Virology Laboratory, where a major aspect of laboratory efforts is developing methods to diagnosis various viral diseases. Lastly, he was the Dean for Research at the University of Illinois College of Medicine.

2. Professional Experience:

a. Teaching

(1) August 1987 - June 2004, Professor, Mathematics, U. S. Naval Academy. (Retired June 30, 2004.)
(2) January 1981 - August 1987, Associate Professor, Mathematics, U. S. Naval Academy.
(3) August 1968 - January 1981, Assistant Professor, Mathematics, U. S. Naval Academy.
(4) August 1962 - August 1968, Instructor Advanced Placement Mathematics, Board of Education of Baltimore County.

b. Professional Societies

(1) American Mathematical Society
(2) Mathematical Association of America

3. General Research Accomplishments:

Dr. Robert A. Herrmann has published (without coauthors) 80 articles in 31 different journals from 14 countries. Of these 80 articles, 55 appear in mathematical science journals, 25 appear in creationary science journals, where, of these 25, 22 present mathematical models for the concepts discussed. He has written over 250 published reviews as well as 7 books, 5 of which where funded by the Federal government and, hence, are available free of change from his Internet website or the Mathematics and Physics arXiv.org archive. The most recent edition of his book "The Theory of Ultralogics" is also available at the viXra.org archive. He has personally presented 31 papers at scientific conferences and over 1,800 scientific disclosures. He has, at present, 27 articles published at the archive arXiv.org and 32 articles published at the archive viXra.org. He has written 4 monographs in nonstandard analysis. He is self-taught in this discipline. Of the 300,000 individuals who produced approximately 1.6 million published papers or books in the mathematical sciences and for whom there was sufficient information in the Mathematical Reviews (MR) archives at the time analyzed, Dr. Herrmann ranked in the top 2%, in the world, in the production of such material.

a.Pure Mathematics

Dr. Herrmann's original research activity was in nonstandard topology. Portions of his dissertation were published in 1975.

[A brief technical description. He continued his efforts in this general area and established most of the presently known nonstandard properties associated with extensions of maps, monad theory on rings of sets, the relations between nonstandard structures and convergence spaces, perfect maps, closed maps, and showed that almost all of the known standard generalizations for continuous, open, closed and perfect maps are simple corollaries to his established theorems. He also showed that there exists a nonstandard and, hence, standard hull for semi-uniform spaces in general and applied these results to standard topological groups. In standard topology, Dr. Herrmann constructed the near-compactifications, essentially completed the theory of one-point near-compactifications, and showed that the theory of S-closed spaces is purely topological in character while giving a method to translate standard topological results into results relative to S-closed spaces.

He continued his research into general topology and discovered the pre-convergence spaces. Once again he established much of the presently known mapping theory for pre-convergence spaces and showed that many of the convergence structures of interest to the mathematical community are but trivial examples of his pre-convergence spaces.]

One of Dr. Herrmann's goals is the popularizing of nonstandard analysis throughout the world. Hence, not content with applying nonstandard methods to topological questions, Dr. Herrmann turned his attention to algebraic structures. These structures are a major aspect of pure axiomatic mathematics.

[A brief technical description. He established many of the known properties for nonstandard implication algebras, lattices, Boolean algebras and the like.]

A major aspect of the subject termed standard mathematical logic is the modeling of deductive processes. Many of these mimic the results of human thought processes. The methods and structures employed to study such aspects of human thought can vary. Dr. Herrmann has produced many new results in this area. This is especially so in his application of nonstandard analysis to this subject.

[A brief technical description. Dr. Herrmann's research activities are on the lattice of finitary (finite) consequence operators. For example, he showed that this class of logical operators is almost atomic and that the set of all finitary consequence operators define on a fixed language is a join-complete lattice. Recently, he has shown that general logic-systems and finitary consequence operators are equivalent notions. He also instituted the new area of nonstandard logic relative to the nonstandard modeling of these classes of consequence operators.]

b. Applied Mathematics and Some Theoretical Physics

In 1981, Dr. Herrmann turned his attention to applied modeling. He rigorously described the methods of infinitesimal reasoning and modeling and then solved the d'Alembert-Euler problem in differential equation derivation. Previously, in about 1979, he had discovered new methods in physical modeling and began in 1982 to apply these methods to various unsolved problems in the philosophy of science, quantum theory, and cosmology as well as other areas. He found a solution to the discreteness problem in quantum theory in 1983.

c. The Theory of Everything and General Information Theory

In 1978, Dr. Herrmann discovered mathematical methods to model discipline language theories that are not necessarily describable by means of numerical quantities. He has applied these methods to various scientific disciplines. In particular, in 1979, he began constructing a mathematical model that generates a cosmogony. A cosmogony is a theory for the origin and construction of universes, not just the one in which we dwell. This cosmogony is called the General Grand Unification Model - the GGU-model.

[A brief technical description. Using ultralogical operators this cosmogony generates the descriptive content for various cosmologies while preserving their inner-logical processes. This is the first mathematically generated cosmogony.

Although not originally constructed in this manner, it has recently been noticed that there is a set of concrete observable facts that when mathematical modeled predict the GGU-model process. These facts are verified physical statements that describe aspects of finite human physical behavior that are characterized by mental activity. When used as hypotheses and mathematically modeled, these facts predict that the formation and behavior of each real physical-system is controlled and sustained by a specific set of significant general ultralogical processes. Mathematically, general ultralogical processes are objects that satisfy the standard or nonstandard characteristics for logical deduction and other aspects of rational finite or hyper-finite mental activity, respectively. The theory is testable and (Popper) falsifiable. The GGU-model is verified by a vast amount of direct and indirect evidence.

This cosmogony and associated portions of the NSP-world model are consistent with such theory logic as deductive quantum logic, finitary logic, classical logic and the like. The GGU-model satisfies the Wheeler requirements for a pre-geometry and the very restricted conditions required by many groups of scientists who specialize in cosmogony studies. Moreover, the modeling procedures automatically generate the theory of propertons (subparticles) and properton (subparticle) mechanisms that satisfy the Wheeler requirements for the "substance" of which space itself is composed. It also satisfies the participator requirements in that active life-forms alter physical-system behavior.]

The GGU-model solves the General Grand Unification Problem. This yields the first true Theory of Everything associated with our universe. Dr. Herrmann has shown how to use various processes to unify all physical-system behavior. Of considerable significance is Dr. Herrmann's explicit method that yields the best possible unification for any collection of physical theories. [This result is an application of Dr. Herrmann's pure algebraic characteristics for the lattice of finitary consequence operators.]

In information theory, Dr. Herrmann has shown that the empirical theory of Gitt information can be obtained from first principles by application of the theory of general consequence operators. He has shown, using Gitt information, that the complexity of a physical-system can be altered only if the necessary consequence operators satisfy a unique and unusual symmetric property. General information theory has other applications.

d. General Intelligent Design (As noted below this is not the Discovery Institute's restricted ID theory.)

In 1979, Dr. Herrmann originated the scientific analysis of physical-system intelligent design. Employing observable physical behavior, Dr. Herrmann began the construction of a mathematical model that predicts that intelligent agency designs each physical-system, designs how they are intertwined at any moment in the development of our universe and designs the moment-to-moment development of our universe. Indeed, the physical processes that form our universe and control all aspects of physical-system behavior, as well as the results of such processes, are designed by a predicted intelligent agency. Additionally, physical-systems are specifically designed to satisfy descriptive "physical laws." Dr. Herrmann's mathematical model is the General Intelligent Design Model (GID-model) or simply General Intelligent Design (GID). The model is based upon a formal definition for a specific form of rational deduction. The model employs the mathematical concepts of the "ultraword" and "ultralogic."

General ID has two interpretations, theological or secular.

General ID is not related in method nor conclusions to the inadequate, unscientific and highly criticized Johnson-Dembski-Behe theory (RID) as championed by members of the Discovery Institute. Their concept of "intelligence" is not a measurable scientific notion. The GID-model and GID-intelligent design is NOT the intelligent design notion symbolized by "ID" and discussed, in detail, throughout the Internet nor by Wikipedia under the heading "intelligent design."

The GID-model shows that, via individual choice, it is rational to assume that all physical-system behavior investigated by science-communities is designed and controlled by an intelligent agent. All physical-system formation and behavior is either direct or indirect evidence for the existence of such a specific intelligent agent. The intelligent agent is predicted to be an "higher" intelligence that satisfies Biblical creationary behavior.

However, as specifically presented, the GID model can also be interpreted as a purely secular notion associated with the GGU-model.

e. The Special and General Theories of Relativity

The Einstein-Hilbert General Theory of relativity and the Einstein Special Theory of relativity have been controversial from the moment that they appeared in published form. In the past, the basic reasons for these controversies have been philosophic in character rather than scientific. However, scientists such as V. Fock pointed out that the General Theory contains an error relative to how physical postulates are associated with the particular mathematical structure employed. This particular error does not detract from most of the results obtained or the verified predictions these theories make. Moreover, many scientists have shown that both of these theories seem to contain various logical inconsistencies and, due to these difficulties, have created alternate theories based upon different foundations - theories that also predict many, but usually not all, of the same results as predicted by the General and Special theories.

Both of these classical theories are based upon the properties of the mathematical object known as the infinitesimal. But no such consistent mathematical theory for infinitesimals that captures all of the necessary intuitive notions existed at the time these theories were created. Such a mathematically consistent theory was discovered in 1961 by Abraham Robinson. One of the basic reasons that mathematics is used within such theories is to maintain rigorous logical argument. This Robinson discovery now allows for a reconsideration of these theories using a rigorous mathematical theory. Due to the existence of this rigorous mathematical theory, its relation to scientific logic, certain properties relative to abstract model theory, and the now obtainable formal rules for physical modeling, this mathematical theory can be applied rigorously to these physical theories. When this is done, it becomes apparent that from a rigorous viewpoint, Einstein, Hilbert and many others have made a basic physical modeling error. This error is called the model theoretic error of generalization. This error was pointed out for another purpose in the philosophy of science of Mill, and can be explicitly demonstrated.

In 1990, Dr. Herrmann pointed out this error to the scientific community and began to re-construct both of these theories using Robinson's theory of the infinitesimal and infinite numbers in the hopes of avoiding this modeling error. Using his separation of operators approach, Dr. Herrmann has, indeed, created a theory that stays within the required language for the foundations for these two theories and this new approach predicts all of the same results as the General and Special theories and eliminates all of the known logical difficulties and paradoxes.

This new infinitesimal approach shows that, from the viewpoint of indirect evidence, a special type of "ether' or "substratum" can be assumed. Further, each of the relativistic alterations in physical behavior associated with these theories is modeled as an interaction with this substratum. This interaction is modeled by applying the basic assumption that within substratum monadic clusters photons satisfy the ballistic property relative to a moving source. That is, they acquire the speed of the source relative to the substratum monadic clusters, while in the standard physical world they exhibit their wave properties. He restricts all fundamental time measurements to light-clocks and then shows that this leads to alterations in other physical behavior, the same alterations predicted by the original theories.

Of course, Dr. Herrmann is aware that his logically rigorous theory might be difficult for members of the physics community to understand since they have put forth considerable effort in the past, and continue do so at this present time, through dedicated research activities using the original classical approach. For this reason alone, many scientists will continue to defend their classical approach. Please note that Dr. Herrmann's work, in this area, is not intended to denigrate those scientists who have, in the past, contributed to these theories or who continue to do so. Dr. Herrmann's results are only relative to the foundations for the General and Special theories.

f. Unifying of Physical Theories.

In 2004, Dr. Herrmann presented the "Best possible unification for any collection of physical theories." (See Internat. J. Math. and Math. Sci., 17(2004):861-872. arxiv.org/abs/physics/0306147 and vixra.org/abs/1309.0013 (Theorem 2.2.)

g. Theology

Of his 137 published and presented articles, Dr. Herrmann has published 18 papers that mathematically model and, hence, show the rationality and intelligent design of various theological concepts. He has posted 27 more articles at arxiv.org and vixra.org that present further mathematically modeled details for these concepts. In particular, in 1978, Dr. Herrmann showed that the comparable non-creationary Biblically described attributes of God are (classically) rational. Further, using the coupled GID and GGU-model, he has shown that strict Biblical creation is also a rational concept.

h. Future Efforts

Dr. Herrmann believes that his most important contributions to physical science are the methods and results that he discovered for generating mathematical models for philosophic concepts and cosmologies since these discoveries have helped explain and solve certain perplexing and long standing problems. When these methods become more widely known, they may revolutionize modeling techniques for the physical sciences. Due to the apparent significance of such models as the GID and GGU-models, he intends to concentrate his efforts in the area of their application to scientific and philosophic problems. In particular, he intends to popularize the Complete GGU-model (i.e. the General Intelligent Design Model (GID) and the GGU-Model), its various interpretations and its mathematical foundations.

4. Awards and Biographical Listings:

(1) AMWS Achievement Award in Physical Science.
(2) "American Men & Women of Science," (Bowker publication.)
(3) "Who's Who in Theology and Science," (Center for Theological Inquiry, A Templeton Foundation publication,) and many other such biographical listings.
(4) Templeton Prize Nominee. (Dr. Herrmann rejects the philosophic stances taken by the Templeton Foundation.)
(5) DoN Meritorious Service Award

The following is a link to Dr. Herrmann's list of publications.

Click back button, or if you retrieved this file directly from the Internet, then return to top of home page. In you retrieved this file while on my website, then return to top of home page.