This site contains considerable information not directly related to this book. In 1979, I originated the mathematical analysis that shows that the production of physical-systems and alterations in their behavior are intelligently designed. My analysis (the GID-model, GID) is not related, in method, to the inadequate and highly criticized Johnson-Dembski-Behe theory (RID) as championed by members of the Discovery Institute. The GID-model (General Intelligent Design Model) is NOT the intelligent design notion discussed on Wikipedia under the heading "intelligent design" and, indeed, contradicts much written there about intelligent design. The page Science Declares Our Universe IS Intelligently Designed gives additional and important information about the only book that discusses GID. These models have purely secular and theological interpretations. Theologically, the General Grand Unification Model (GGU-model) and its GID interpretation form an analogue model for processes that, in their combined and most general form, can be intuitively described as transforming God's thoughts into physical reality. My professional biography.

For a special e-mail address and very important information for those that have a copy of this book, please see The Book. Hostile reviews of my articles and books.

IMPORTANT NOTE for those who are primarily interested in the GGU or GID models. The above book is a necessary introduction to the GGU and GID-models. It uses the view that our universe is a vast collection of physical-systems and the notion of the "ultimate ultraword." A second new approach that eliminates one of the ultimate ultrawords is now used. It employs only a single "ultraword" for each specific universe and incorporates the notion of emergent properties. (Technically, this approach uses the theorems in section 4 of this paper.) The above book does discuss how a single ultraword behaves. Once these "book" concepts are understood, then the single ultraword approach will also be understood. In order to better comprehend the GGU or GID-models, you should first read this introduction to some of the basic concepts used.

Special Articles.

Who is Jesus?

God, as He is Biblically described, is a scientifically rational concept. The introduction gives the reasons why it is important that the rationality of this concept be established. This significant result should be known by all of humankind. (This is a specific example of modern mathematical philosophy.) This paper defines the notion of the mathematical infinite and shows that, although the strength of God's comparative attributes and intelligence can be modeled mathematically, the mathematics apparently cannot model an ultimate (i.e. absolute) bound for such strengths. The mathematics does imply that accepting such an ultimate bound is a rational hypothesis.

This extremely important paper on "processes" is a rather detailed, general and technical, GGU and GID-model outline for the construction of our universe. (Any GGU-model universe can also be described as an "information (controlled) universe.") This refines and simplifies the basic approach discussed in the above book and emergent properties are included as well as the GID-interpretation. This is the html version.

At this section (#8) is additional information on General Intelligent Design and the GGU-model. There is a link to my Journal of Creation 2009 article comparing the two forms of intelligent design and a second article comparing these two concepts. This article on GID Evidence discusses the evidence that shows that every second trillions upon trillions of physical events occur that imply that our universe is intelligently designed.

****During creation day-four, there is a problem with scientifically relating starlight to the Biblical time-frame. In this article are two papers, one with and one without mathematical symbols and terminology, and using a DVD illustration, solves this starlight and time problem. Further, in a step-by-step developmental manner, this model can produce any of the known scientific cosmologies. This is the Rapid-Formation Model (RFM). This third article contains a descriptive theologically based DVD illustration for the entire Genesis1 sequence and includes application of the RFM.****

This paper on Thought Control shows that certain mental processes can be influenced by the actions of defined immaterial entities. These entities are identified and produce results similar to those discussed by Eccles and Robinson (The Wonder of Being Human, Our Brain and Our Mind, The Free Press, 1984). These processes are distinct from those used for the secular GGU-model and, hence, do not alter GGU-model conclusions.

Did God create the material world from nothing? Further, is the concept of omnipotent logically contradictory? Can God create a stone He cannot left? I also answer the questions How Can the Earth be Both 4.5 Billion and 6,000 Years Old? and Am I a YEC?. For each theologically related paper that appears on this website, this short article explains my personal theory of Biblical interpretation.

This partially technical paper shows that questions posed by the Templeton Prize winner Michael Heller have been answered previously. Terms taken from the above book are used. In the technical part, it is shown that, for a concept represented by a specific set of examples, there is an "ultraconcept" that rationally implies each of the examples. A few applications are given.

Except in an appendix, the major articles on this website do not contain any mathematical derivations. Some of my IJMMS published papers were poorly edited. Please go to arxiv.org for archived versions.

(1) All of the presented conclusions relative to theology and creationary science that appear on this web site have been obtained independently. That is, these conclusions are not based upon statements made by any non-biblical individual. Further, I am not associated with such groups as ICR, AiG, Hugh Ross, Discovery Institute and the like. (2) All of the material that appears on this web site is *copyrighted.* (3) Material attributed to Robert A. Herrmann, excluding 19, is *ll category (3) material may be reproduced or published in any form, without payment of any fees if not altered copyrighted* by Robert A. Herrmann as of the date of the original or revision. (4) Except for any portion of the above Xulon Press book, aand proper credit is given as to the author's identity.

1. My Biography 1A. Speech and Learning Disorders	2. What the G - T notation Means. 2A. A Unification for All the Physical Theories.	3. Extended Christian Testimony 3A. Modeling Divine Attributes - God is a Scientifically Rational Concept	4. What is Creationary Science? The Methods I use.	5. The 1996 Templeton Prize Nomination	5a. Templeton Foundation Exposé
6. Gödel's Theorem states fact and Paul Davies Refuted	7. Hugh Ross Errors	8. The Discovery that Our Universe is Designed by an Intelligence	9. Free Scientific Articles and Those On the Archives 9A. What is Space-Time?	10. Simplifying the GID & GGU-models	11. A Course in MA-model Theology
12. Wondrous Design of Chance Events 12A Random - Its True Meaning	13. Randomness - A Strong Deception	14. A Personal Miraculous Event 14A. A Miracle Producing Mechanism	15. My Personal Genesis 1 - 8 Universe Creating Model 15A. What Can Be Known	16. Your Endangered Mind - Internet Book	17. Your Endanger Mind - Secular
18. Important Free Books in Math. & Sci.	18A. Nonstandard Analysis Simplified	19. Thought Control 19A. Dangerous Belief Systems	20. Published Papers	21. Solution "General Grand Unification"	22. Mathematics, Science, Theology
23. I am a Biblical Christian.	24. Evil of A. Bailey's New Age	25. Evil of the Psychic Movement	26. Presented Papers	27. Published Abstracts	28. Retirement statement
29. E=mc^2 Not Einstein's Discovery	Statement on Hypothesis Acceptance

1. Professional Biography

1A. (G) The Wondrous Human Brain, Dyslexia and Other Stuff. This is a brief article as to my personal experiences with various speech and learning disorders and how I have compensated for their effects.

2. Readme. Before attempting to read any of the next articles, please read the following that explains the meaning of the symbols (G) and (T) that appear after each section heading.

2A. (T) The Best Possible Unification for Any Collection of Physical Theories, (Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci., 17(2004):861-872.) It is well known that even if the particle physics community produces a physical theory that unifies the four fundamental interactions (forces) that, due to emerging properties, such a unification will not produce a unification for the set of all physical properties and scientific physical theories that appear to govern appropriate natural-system behavior. On page 9 of 0306147.pdf, the material contained in the paragraph that follows Theorem 4.1 shows that the "best" unification for the set of all such physical theories exists. The definition for this unification also leads to a logic-system that yields the unification.

3. (G) Extended Christian Testimony.

3A. (G - T) Modeling Divine Attributes. At the end of my testimony, I mention my 1978 mathematical modeling discoveries. This brief article explains the simplest aspects of how Divine attributes as well as various "trinity" notions can be mathematically modeled. Further, I describe how it is possible to show that the God of the Bible is a scientifically rational concept and that everything that exists today is indirect evidence for His existence.

4. (G - T) What is Creationary Science? The Scientific Methods I Use. This article is relative to the basic scientific methods as employed today. In particular, those methods used throughout much of creationary science, secular physical science and how these methods relate to the contributes I have made to creationary science. I present specifically the methods I use.

5. (G) Templeton Prize Nomination.

5a. (G) A John Templeton Foundation Exposé. In this article, the written words of John Templeton, the founder of the John Templeton Foundation (a.k.a. Templeton Foundation), are analyzed. Theological concepts that govern the Templeton Foundation and their relation to basic Christian doctrine are fully investigated and the source of the Templeton Foundation theological doctrine is identified. At the end, a link to a different analysis by AIG is also provided.

6. (G - T) The Major Paul Davies Hypotheses are Invalid. In this article, it is first shown via Aristotle's correspondence property for "truth" that Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem is true. That it leads to no contradictions. It is shown that the mathematical notion of "truth" in a model is true via Aristotle's correspondence property. The theological implications of Davies conclusions are shown to be false. One of Paul Davies major hypotheses is the claim that the laws of nature have a special property called Turing computability and as such the universe in which we dwell can be simulated by what is technically called a universal Turing machine or computer. It has been stated that this hypothesis has led to significant "Progress in Religion." However, such "Progress" has not occurred, since this Davies hypothesis is false. I specifically refute this hypothesis by using the 1977 Paris-Harrington theorem for which an explicit example is given. Explicit examples are also given that lead to tangible physical results that cannot be produced by a universal Turing machine.

7. (G - T) Important Comments on the Ministry of Hugh Ross Ph.D. In this comment, I have found it necessary to discuss the relation between the Hugh Ross ministry "Reasons to Believe," the concept of the false prophet or false apostle, and creationary models that have a form of godliness, but deny the power thereof.

8. (G) Science Declares Our Universe IS Intelligently Designed. I am the originator of the notion that mathematical analysis can be applied to establish that natural-system behavior is intelligently designed, and produced, sustained or guided by intelligent agents. This conclusion is one aspect of General Intelligent Design theory (GID). GID is an interpretation of the General Grand Unification model (GGU-model), the first general Theory of Everything. The GGU-model is physical in character. Indeed, the GGU-model can be considered as a "larger" more complex physical environment in which universes are embedded. However, the mathematical operators used for the physical model also have various intelligent agent signatures. The interpreted GGU-model is so highly scientific in character that when any individual conducts a scientific experiment and verifies an inductive or deductive statement, then this also verifies the GGU-model. Previously, all of my scientific results have appeared in "journal form." But, because of the false impression given by other individuals that they originated this notion, I have written a non-technical, yet, complete book on the GID-model and aspects of the fundamental GGU-model. This book contains a large amount of new information and many illustrations not available from any of my Internet articles or books. It covers the three basic interpretations - purely physical, intelligent design, and, in a brief 22 page section, some theological interpretations. This book is available as indicated above. GID is considerably more significant than the notion of "intelligent design" (RID or restricted design theory) as championed by Behe, Dembski, Johnson and others. There are no mathematical "proofs" in this book, although all of my major results are predicted mathematically. The book presents in an informal conversational style the complete detailed conclusions of this 30-year research project. This book should be comprehensible by individuals who have had a college level course that scientifically examines physical-system behavior.

On this web site, I have various links that discuss aspects of GGU-model and add new material. This important link is to a very brief article that compares certain linguistic differences between the GID notion of a higher-intelligence and the RID notion of intelligence. Further, it contrasts these notions theologically. This article The two meanings for modern intelligent design, published 2009, is an important article on the RID and GID-model differences and criticisms. For physical universes, this is a more technical article than the previous link that establishes the significance of the General Intelligent Design model (general design theory) as compared with the restricted design theory being popularized by the Discovery Institute, please see (G) A Comparison: General Design Versus Restricted Design Theory. This is a summary of some additional physical universe results using an interpretation in terms of intelligent agents and intelligent design. This is a more complete non-technical discussion of GID-model conclusions with a few illustrations and contains a not necessary but significant Scriptural interpretation.

In this article, I give a simple illustration of how the mental processes change descriptions, pictures and other such information into reality. By comparison, the mental process are those that one would associate with a higher-intelligence not located within any physical universe.

The paper (G) My Intelligent Design Priority establishes my priority in this area of intelligent design. Further, this is a Glossary of GGU-model terms.

This article on GID Evidence discusses the evidence that shows that every second trillions upon trillions of physical events occur that imply that our universe is intelligently designed.

The very important paper (G - T) "The Fundamental Universe-Generating Processes" is a rather detailed GGU and GID-model outline for the construction of universes. Emergent properties are included as well as the GID-interpretation. This is the html version.

In this book, I use a correct notion for information termed specific information. Recently such information has been extended to included (informational) instructions. This brief paper shows how the results from this book "define" specific information. Instructions are defined and presented in the Fundamental Processes article.

9. Some free papers that you may download without restrictions. 1 (G-T) Formally establishing that Paul's Mars Hill argument is logically consistent. 2 (G) Scientific methods used. 3 (G) How was our universe created? 4 (G) Your endangered mind: The great scientific deception. (A brief secular discussion.) 5 (G - T) Mathematical Philosophy and evolutionary processes. 6 (G - T) A U-cosmology. 7 (T) A microeffect that could yield a world-wide flood. 8 (T) General relativity and possible contrary predictions. 9 (T) The facts about gravitational time-dilation. 10 (T) The present invalid nature of Humphreys' White Hole Cosmology. 11 (G - T) E = mc^2 is not Einstein's discovery. 12 (G - T) © reprint. The scientific existence of a higher intelligence. This is an older paper on a subject that now has been highly refined. You may download this with certain restrictions. 13 (G) Does God sustain fundamental physical behavior by discrete or non-smooth processes? 14 (T) The meaning of the physical metric ds and a theoretical verification of a time-dilation conjecture. 15 (G - T) The Existence of Ultimate Concepts. 16 T Special Relativity and the nonstandard photon-particle medium (the NSPPM) A technical outline.

My arXiv.org Papers and Books

Many important papers and books appear on the arxiv.org archives. They can be retrieved at this URL. All improvements and additions to these papers and books appear on this website. The books listed on this website are updated and, except that they may be formatted differently, correspond exactly to those at the arxiv.org archives.

Article 4, above, A U-Cosmology describes a Biblically literal model that reveals immensely powerful Divine creationary processes. This older article should be considered as subsidiary to the above book "Science Declares . . ." and other newer material that appears on this web site. It was produced prior to this book. It does give a purely scientifically generated model for Biblical creation that could be useful and it describes those specific Divine mechanisms that allow God to have knowledge of the past, the present and the future, and still allow for great alterations in physical-system behavior as well as free-will. It contains useful Biblical statements that interpretations of the GGU-model satisfy.

9A. (G - T (Basic Calculus)) What do the Expressions - Space, Space-Time, Time-Dilation and an Expanding Universe - Actually Signify? In this PDF article, the science-fiction myths about these expressions are removed and their actually meanings are explained. It is shown that the geometric language used is only an analogue model for behavior - behavior that has physical meaning in terms of our everyday experiences.

10. (G - T) Simplifying the technical aspects of the GD-world, GGU, GID-models and the U-cosmology. This paper contains the general intuitive concepts needed before exploring the technical aspects of these models.

11. (G - T) A Short Course in the GD-world and MA-models as They Relate to Theology This is an introductory course for the GD-world and MA-model portion of the GGU-model as they can be interpreted theologically. This short course consists of a series of 13 e-mail postings that were presented to a special Internet group.

12. (T) The Wondrous Design and Non-random Character of Chance Events. In this article, it is shown specifically that physical-system chance events as represented by theory predicted (a priori) probabilistic statements used in such realms as modern particle physics, among others, are only random relative to the restricted language of the theory that predicts such behavior. It is shown that all such "chance" physical events are related one-to-another by a remarkably designed, systematic and wondrous collection of equations that model how the physical laws and processes specifically yield such physical events. A second result shows theoretically that all such "chance" behavior is caused by the application of well-defined ultralogics. These results show specifically that the fundamental underlying behavior associated with all physical systems that comprise our universe is controlled internally by processes that cannot be differentiated from those that mirror the behavior of an infinitely powerful mind. From a Scriptural viewpoint, these results reveal signatures for God that represent His continual presence and control over all aspects of the physical universe.

12A (G - T) Abuses of Randomness In this brief article, I show once again that the use of the terms "random" and "disorder" with their common meaning within scientific literature are used only for psychological and philosophic reasons. The basic meanings for these terms no longer exist from the view point of General Intelligent Design theory. Indeed, it has never been necessary to use these terms when describing physical-system behavior. A new term "mindom" is proposed as a replacement for both of these terms. Mindom is a term that describes the actual facts.

13. Randomness and Evolutionary Cosmology - A Strong Deception. This brief article is my attempt to eliminate the ignorance displayed by members of the atheistic, "probabilistic" or "evolutionary" scientific communities relative to "randomness" and "inanimate evolutionary cosmology" and exactly what my three complementary articles on this subject have established mathematically.

14. (G) A Personal Statement. These very significant statements describe the history of a miraculous event that has determined my entire theological endeavors from 30 June 1983 until the present. The last paragraph of this statement contains an important message to any individual who does not truly believe in the God of the Scriptures

14A. (G - T) A Miracle Producing Mechanism This very brief article discusses a recent result that shows how a specific member of the General Grand Unification Model, when theologically interpreted, can be used to produce what would be acknowledged by many as miracles.

15. (G) Additional Personal Statements. Although the GGU-model rationally satisfies numerously many secular interpretations for the formation and evolutionary development of our universe, it also shows that various theological interpretations are rational possibilities. In these four statements, I describe my acceptance of a specific creationary science scenario for the creation of our universe. In particular, I give evidence for the acceptance of one such interpretation that upholds the rationality of a strict literally interpreted Genesis 1 - 8 scenario. The processes employed yield a "young" original Earth and also yield a universe (including our local environment and our present day earth) that gives the appearance of being billions of years old. Further, this model explains why there exists physical evidence for both a young earth and an ancient earth.

15A. (G) What Can Be Known As fully explained in the above book, the GGU-model gives insight into a rational discussion of what humankind can actually "know," at present, about certain significant concepts. These brief remarks use the notion of "creation out of nothing" as a basic illustration.

16. (G) Your Endangered Mind: The Great Scientific Deception, Christian Version. Many members of the scientific community have tried frantically to prevent you from reading this very important book. This book as well as the one below contains material that is different from that which appears in "Science Declares Our Universe IS Intelligently Designed."

17. (G) Your Endangered Mind: The Great Scientific Deception, Original Secular Version. The basic personal conclusions established by the MA-model apply to every intelligent life form within the universe. The physical applications are independent from any other scientific theory. To show this, I present the original slightly more detailed secular version written in HTML and presented in one compressed zip file with images.

18. (T) Important Free Books in Mathematics and Science. 1 Elementary Mathematical Logic. 2 Modern Infinitesimal Modeling and Nonstandard Analysis. 3 The Theory of Ultralogics. 4 Nonstandard Analysis Applied to the Special and General Theories of Relativity - The Theory of Infinitesimal Light-clocks. (Einstein Corrected.)

18A. (T) Nonstandard Analysis - A Simplified Approach. My General Intelligent Design (GID) theory requires, for the mathematics, Nonstandard Analysis. This book presents the simplest possible nonstandard approach to the material in a basic undergraduate first course in real analysis. This is one or two step beyonds the usual calculus courses. After considering the material presented, you would need to continue to the next level of nonstandard analysis as contained in the other free books, in this subject, listed on this web site or at arxiv.org. (GID theory requires the material in book #3 as listed above.) Although the material in this book is copyrighted, it may be reproduced in any form without payment of any fees as long as the material is properly credited to its author.

19. (G - T) Thought Control In this paper, scientifically described processes are used to show how certain mental processes can be influenced by the actions of defined immaterial entities. These entities are theologically identified and produce results similar to those discussed by Eccles and Robinson (The Wonder of Being Human, Our Brain and Our Mind, The Free Press, 1984) and by Popper.

19A (G) The Inherent Dangers Manifested by Certain Belief Systems This PDF article contains findings that were disseminated to various U. S. Federal government agencies and individual members in 1981. Originally, the conclusions were "confidential," but on 15 Aug 1981 they were presented at the annual meeting of the American Scientific Affiliation. Predictions are made that have occurred, are occurring today and most probably will continue to occur.

20. Published Papers

---

21. (T - G -T) Monograph M1

Solutions to the "General Grand Unification Problem ," and the Questions. "How Did Our Universe Come Into Being?" and "Of What is Empty Space Composed?".

Presented before the Mathematical Association of America at Western Maryland College, 12 NOV 1994.

This presents the first solution to these Patton and Wheeler questions as well as the basic question "Is physics legislated by a cosmogony." These questions, and others, are specifically answered by first generating a falsifiable cosmogony via mathematical modeling. Since such a cosmogony is capable of generating universes, not just the one in which we dwell, and their respective "physics," then the General Grand Unification model, with certain exceptions, must essentially be explanatory in its final form for it must predict the behavior of all physical-systems that reside in each universe. Abstract 1 Also see the scientific justification and need for a cosmogony.

---

22. (G - T) Modern Mathematics - Its Relation to Physical Science and Theology This is a very important discussion of the relation between mathematics and these other distinct disciplines. It removes all of the myths and misunderstandings relative to this relation. The facts discussed in this article are based upon the experiences of an expert in mathematical modeling. However, numerology and Bible codes are not discussed nor do I consider such concepts as valid
23. I have been an Biblical Apostolic Christian since 15 AUG 1983 and there are millions of Biblical Apostolic Christians throughout the world who are identified by many different labels. My acceptance of this fundamental doctrine is based upon my own personal analysis of the Scriptures. My acceptance of this doctrine does not imply that I accept any additional doctrine that is part of the canon of any religious organization that also accepts the following statements. As a Biblical Apostolic Christian, I only accept the final theological doctrine of the original Apostles including Paul. This Apostles doctrine is considered as sufficient for salvation. "Brothers, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, the gospel that you received and in which you are firmly established; because the gospel will save you only if you keep believing exactly what I preached to you - believing anything else will not lead to anything." 1 Corinthians 15: 1-2 (Jerusalem Bible).((v.2) "It was that alone by which they could hope for salvation." Matthew Henry.) Generally, I do not proselytize. However, if you are truly interested in the circumstances that led to my accepting the Apostles doctrine and becoming a Biblical Apostolic Christian please consider this pdf file.

---

Ezekiel 33:6, 8 - 9.

24. (G - T) A Modern Manifestation of Absolute Evil; The New Age, the New This, the New That Movement. This is a revision of my 1982 scientific analysis of the ethics and "theology" of the New Age, New World, New "almost anything" occult movement using the writings of the founder of this movement, Alice A. Bailey. The concepts advocated by Bailey have become part of many so-called Christian organizations. Since "code word" titles and "names" for certain objects are being altered, identification by means of characteristics is necessary. This research is mainly concerned with those Bailey concepts that would most affect the conservative Christian community. Also detailed, with numerous exhibits, is the absolute evil intent of ALL of the concepts and methods employed within this movement. Important Internet examples are given.

25. (G) Another Manifestation of Absolute Evil, the "Psychic" and "Paranormal" Movement. This article will detail the true basis and extreme danger of the "Psychic this," the "Psychic that" and the "paranormal" movement. It is shown how these extremely dangerous concepts and practices are being made a part of our cultural environment; how to recognize the applications of these concepts, and how to avoid the deceptions that radiate from the "angel of light." Various Internet examples are given. [Since the material presented in this article is based upon personal experiences, this article will not be altered. Further, any form of logical argument cannot eliminate the conclusions.]

---

26. Presented Papers.

27. Published Abstracts

28. ** This statement is only for identification purposes. After 38 years of federal government service, I have officially retired from the faculty of United States Naval Academy. I am no longer officially associated with any Federal agency. Neither the United States Naval Academy nor any other Federal agency endorse the material that appears on this Web site.

---

Throughout all of the information contained within this web site, strict logical argument is applied. As with many informal logical arguments, not all hypotheses are stated explicitly. Many such hypotheses come under the heading of "self-evident." Please do not assume additional hypotheses that are not intended and thereby produce erroneous enthymemes (i.e. logical arguments based upon hypotheses that are not assumed). Further, I accept a scientific hypothesis as fact only if there is an abundance of physical evidence that verifies the hypothesis.

---